Council Tax 3 - As a Mansion Tax...?

Council Tax Unfair:  Council tax is already unfair to those in the lower bands or in Band H with a house worth upto say, £2 million or so.When the so-called "mansion tax" was first mooted I was confused because it sounded like "council tax" without the need for a full revaluation - I assumed that an annual lump sum on would be paid on top of whatever was to be paid with the council tax, ie by those with a house worth £1 or £2 million or more.  

Of course those with houses in the lower part of Band H would have to be sorted out. The real issue is whether we really want fairness in local taxation or not. 

The low Band H owners or occupiers can be sorted out quite easily but do we want to do so????

Policy Statement:  I reckoned mansion tax would be a weak attempt at improving the progressive nature of council tax at the highest band. However, without seeing detailed policy statement on the mechanics of mansion tax I reserve comment. 

Revaluation:  To introduce mansion tax, I understand, it has been suggested that a revaluation would be needed. Really, perhaps it could be done a different way...? 

Thus,  the Valuation Office Agency (VOA) need not revalue all dwellings but allow self-assessment by those with houses or flats in Band H (or Band I in Wales).  (Self assessment is already used extensively in national taxation, eg in inheritance tax (IHT).)

Thus, at a certain date owners and/or occupiers of dwellings in Band H select an open market value  for their property in accord with the statutory definition. That is figure is recorded in the "valuation lists" ie one of several bands, ie in  "Bands for Top Values".

New Statute: A new statute would be needed to give effect to all this - including:

• several extra Bands of ascending band widths;
• a set of council tax (mansion tax) charging rates which are progressive and increasingly proportional to Band A
• An VAO challenge system to counter mistakes of valuation, ie self assessments of capital values;
• if the property is subsequently sold at a higher figure, that figure will be used to correlate, eg allowing for inflation, the "correctness" of the self assessment.

No doubt other factors could be built in, eg help in cases of hardship:   but the intention is to increase fairness in the local taxation system.

Council Tax 2 - Jumping to Higher Band - Anomalies

There has not been a council tax "revaluation" for yoinks. So unless there is a council tax revaluation most houses and flats will retain their present banding for council tax hereafter. Also, even if the owner-occupier improves the property and this results in a capital value (at 1991 capital values) greater than the top figure of the present band, it will not normally result in more council tax being paid.

There is one exception to this rule. If the owner improves and sells later the new owner will find that the Valuation Office Agency (VOA) will want to establish the appropriate banding for the improved dwelling. If it moves to a highter banding more council tax becomes payable.

There may be exception to this rule! If a person buys a substantial vacant property already converted into say, five flats which are each at Band H (in England) Each is worth £1 million. He/she then converts the property into a single dweelling worth say £15 millions. The band remains at Band H.

The outcome is that the local authorities, police authority and fire and rescue services have all lost council tax from that property site. If it is made up, the other poorer (perhaps) council tax payers make up most of the difference - to maintain revenues.

Council Tax 1 - An Environmental Tax...? Playing in a Band

Council tax is assessed on the capital value of each dwelling and the dwelling is placed in a council tax band. The bands range from A to H in England and were, in effect, first set up in the early 1990's on values at 1st April 1991.

Each higher band above Band A is a proportionally higher - so that Band H (over £320,000) is 18 (where Band A is 6 (upto £40,000)). Thus, council tax is reasonably progressive from Band A to Band G. Thereafter, occupiers of a houses in Band H are all treated as being equally poor relative to the rest of the occupiers of the 2o million or so dwellings in the country.

Today, relative to one's wealth embedded in a dwelling, every owner-occupier is virtually treated in the same way as a multi-billionaire! One could do so much more for the environment if the bands for council tax ranged from Band A ..to...Band H... to...Band Z (dwellings with capital values of say, over say, £40,000,000.

Whether council tax is an "environmental tax" is, of course, a matter of definition. Capital values of houses and so on do or should reflect the quality of the local environment; so one might say "Yes, council tax is an environmental tax".

A report of an on-going saga concerns a house where a nearby new wind farm of eight 100m turbines has resulted in sounds of "Whooses" or "Wooms" and "Humming". It has been so intolerable that the occupiers moved out of their house and are now claiming damages. The report indicates that their home has become unmarketable as a family home. Also, a council tax reduction was warranted. It is the last point that is of interest in this post; it is not clear how the reduction came about.

Was it one of the following:

1. A reduction in value,resulting in a drop in the banding?
2. A council tax refunding or remission on the grounds of hardship?
3. A council tax "holiday" - again on the gounds of hardship?
4. A reduction under some other relief provision for council tax? or
5. An ex-gratia allowance or concession?